Multi-Country
Per Capita and VMT/VKmT Fatality Data for 2004
Page
first published on September 3, 2005, and last updated on October 16,
2005.
Edited
by Eddie Wren
|
OECD
Pos'n
a |
Per Capita
Death Rate (2004) b |
Country
c |
Number
of Deaths, 2004 |
Trend
in Number of Deaths |
Population (millions)
d |
VMT/VKmT
Rate (2003) e |
1 |
--
|
3.25 n
|
Malta
|
13 f
|
-
18.8% f |
0.4
|
|
2 |
1
|
4.93
|
Netherlands
|
804 f
|
-
21.8% f |
16.3
|
7.7
|
3 |
2
|
5.33
|
Sweden
|
480 f
|
-
9.3% f |
9.0
|
8.3
|
4 |
3
|
5.34
|
United
Kingdom
|
3,221 h
|
-
7.9% f |
60.3
|
7.5
|
5 |
4
|
5.59
|
Norway
|
257 f
|
-
8.2% f |
4.6
|
8.3
|
6 |
5
|
5.76
|
Japan
|
7,358 l
|
-
17.11% |
127.7
|
11.2
|
7 |
6
|
6.83
|
Denmark
|
369 f
|
-
14.6% f |
5.4
|
9.7
|
8 |
7
|
6.85
|
Switzerland
|
510 f
|
-
6.6% f |
7.45
|
8.8
|
9 |
8
|
7.09
|
Germany
|
5,842 f
|
-
11.7% f |
82.4
|
9.7
|
10 |
9
|
7.21
|
Finland
|
375 f
|
-
1.1% f |
5.2
|
7.6
|
11 |
10
|
7.67
|
Iceland
|
23 f
|
0% f |
0.3
|
16.0
|
12 |
11
|
7.75
|
FYR
Macedonia
|
155 f
|
+31.4%
f |
2.0
|
|
13 |
12
|
7.94
|
Australia
|
1,596 i
|
-
1.5% i |
20.1
|
8.0
|
14 |
--
|
8.33
|
India c
|
90,000
q
|
|
1,080.3
|
|
15 |
13
|
8.56
|
Canada
|
2730 t
|
-
1.7% |
31.9
|
8.9
|
16 |
14
|
8.67
|
France
|
5,232 f
|
-
8.7% f |
60.4
|
10.9
|
17 |
--
|
8.82
|
Serbia
and Montenegro
|
953 f
|
+11.1%
f |
10.8
|
|
18 |
--
|
8.82
|
Lebanon c
|
397
|
|
4.5
|
|
19 |
--
|
9.0
|
Albania
|
315 f
|
+21.2%
f |
3.5
|
|
20 |
15
|
10.74
|
New
Zealand
|
436 j
|
-
5.0% |
4.06
|
12.4
|
21 |
--
|
9.20
|
Moldova
|
405 f
|
-
4.7% f |
4.4
|
|
22 |
16
|
9.48
|
Ireland
|
379 f
|
+13.1%
f |
4.0
|
10.9
|
23 |
--
|
10.27
|
Azerbaijan
|
811 f
|
+12.0%
f |
7.9
|
|
24 |
17
|
10.65
|
Luxembourg
|
49 f
|
-
7.6% f |
0.46
|
|
25 |
18
|
10.71
|
Austria
|
878 f
|
-
5.7% f |
8.2
|
11.7
|
26 |
19
|
10.81
|
Portugal
|
1,135 f
|
-
16.3% f |
10.5
|
|
27 |
20
|
11.26
|
Slovak
Republic
|
608 f
|
-
6.9% f |
5.4
|
46.9
|
28 |
21
|
|
Italy
g
|
|
|
58.0
|
|
29 |
22
|
11.79
|
Spain
|
4,751 f
|
-
12.2% f |
40.3
|
|
30 |
--
|
12.57
|
Bulgaria
|
943 f
|
-
1.8% f |
7.5
|
|
31 |
23
|
12.96
|
Hungary
|
1,296 f
|
-
2.3% f |
10.0
|
|
32 |
24
|
-(13)-
|
Turkey
|
4,428 f
|
-
11.7% f |
68.9
|
|
33 |
--
|
13.08
|
Estonia
|
170 f
|
+
3.7% f |
1.3
|
|
34 |
--
|
13.51
|
Croatia
|
608 f
|
-
13.3% f |
4.5
|
|
35 |
25
|
13.55
|
Czech
Republic
|
1,382 f
|
-
4.5% f |
10.2
|
31.7
|
36 |
--
|
13.55
|
Georgia
|
637 f
|
+11.4%
f |
4.7
|
|
37 |
--
|
13.7
|
Slovenia
|
274 f
|
+13.2%
f |
2.0
|
16.7
|
38 |
26
|
|
Belgium
g
|
|
|
10.3
|
16.3
|
39 |
--
|
14.51
|
Ukraine c
|
6,966 f
|
-
2.5% f |
48.0
|
|
40 |
27
|
14.53
|
USA
|
42,636 m
|
-
0.58% |
293.5
|
9.4 m
|
41 |
28
|
|
Republic
of Korea g
|
|
|
48.1
|
26.0
|
42 |
29
|
14.80
|
Poland
|
5,712 f
|
+
1.3% f |
38.6
|
|
43 |
30
|
15.27
|
Greece
|
1,619 f
|
+
0.3% f |
10.6
|
26.7
|
44 |
--
|
|
Belarus
g
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
45
|
--
|
17.42
|
Romania
|
2,418 f
|
+
8.2% f |
22.4
|
|
46 |
--
|
19.07
|
Qatar
|
164 p
|
|
0.86 (05)
|
|
47 |
--
|
20.89
|
Lithuania
|
752 f
|
+
6.1% f |
3.6
|
|
48 |
--
|
21.04
|
Malaysia
s
|
6223
s
|
|
23.9
(05)
|
|
49 |
--
|
22.43
|
Latvia
|
516 f
|
+
4.7% f |
2.3
|
|
50 |
--
|
24.01
|
Russian
Federation
|
34,506 f
|
-
3.1% f |
143.7
|
|
51 |
-- |
38.7
|
Iran
|
26,280 o
|
|
68.0 (05)
|
|
52 |
-- |
(8.26)
|
China c
r
|
(107,077
k)
|
|
1,296.5
|
|
See
a 15-year history of per capita death rates for the (now) 30 member
countries of the OECD, including the USA
We
also have tables showing: the 2003 per capita data for all 50 American
states
and:
Multi-Country
Per Capita Fatality Data for 2003
DSA
Comments
It
must be remembered that there are three primary measures for comparing
multi-national crash and fatality data: the deaths per 100,000 population
or per capita rate, deaths in relation to overall
distance travelled (known in the USA as the VMT rate), and deaths
in relation to the number of registered motor vehicles in the country (the
latter of which is not shown at all in the above table). All
three measures should be considered when comparing disparate countries but
using just one of these methods is generally acceptable when comparing
countries of similar status (e.g. "highly motorised countries" [HMCs],
developed nations, third world countries, etc.).
As a result, some countries in the above table may appear to present
bizarre results, either because -- like China, for example -- they have a
very high death toll but this is offset by a huge population, or they simply
have, say, a very low proportion of motor vehicles per head of population
-- such as Brunei, that was at the head of the DSA per capita
table for 2003.
There is also the question of how, exactly, a traffic fatality is defined
in any particular country. Some may only include deaths at the scene,
whereas others will stipulate deaths within 24 hours or one week but the
growing norm would now appear to be deaths within 30 days of the crash.
In some cases, above, the data for the number of deaths simply cannot
be relied upon as being accurate. In Turkey, for example, the national
press state that over 9,000 people are killed in road crashes each year,
and yet each year data is published by that country giving a much lower
body count.
It
is worth mention that many individuals in the USA dismiss the per
capita rate as unimportant and claim that as America is a huge
country and journeys can be extremely long, only the VMT rate (or
VKmT equivalent) is important. Yet only a little thought would
suggest that this is a fallacious approach. The vast distances
that allegedly support this argument are primarily undertaken on
the very type of roads that are known to be the safest -- divided
highways (known elsewhere as dual carriageways). Over half of all
people killed on America's roads die in crashes on rural roads,
and this would seem to suggest that the argument favoring the VMT
rate to the exclusion of all others is not valid.
|
Footnotes
and Sources
-
Applies only to the thirty member-countries of the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD], as listed in
the International
Road Traffic and Accident Database (which was only updated
from 2002 to 2003 during July 2005). This therefore gives a
guide to the generally more developed nations, between which
comparisons may be somewhat more valid. Most of the data posted here have not been prepared from data supplied by IRTAD and must not be
taken as being official IRTAD results;
-
The per capita rate represents the number of deaths for each
100,000 members of the population;
-
Countries
marked c are new to the DSA list this year;
-
Population
figures are actually July 2004, sourced from the CIA World Factbook, or
simply '2004', sourced from the World
Bank, except where shown otherwise;
-
In the USA, the measure used is deaths per 100 million Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT). Elsewhere it is deaths per one billion vehicle
kilometres travelled and it is this latter, more widely-used measure that is
applied in
the above table. The data given in the column in question is all for
2003. Source: International
Road Traffic and Accident Database (OECD) The 2004 figure for the
USA (with American spelling) is 9.07 deaths per one
billion vehicle kilometers traveled (1.46 VMT);
-
Source:
'Preliminary
Data on Road Safety in Europe in 2004' (European Conference of
Ministers of Transport) issued on September 1, 2005;
-
No
data yet located but in the interim these countries are positioned
roughly where we expect them to appear in order of per capita
ratings;
-
UK
Department for Transport, June 2005;
-
Source:
'Road
Deaths in 2004 Amongst Lowest Since 1950' Press Release L7/05,
from the Minister for Local Government, Territories and Roads; 24
January, 2005;
-
The
Social Report 2005, Ministry of Social Development, New Zealand
Government;
-
Official
figure from the Chinese Government, but the WHO estimates a far higher
figure;
-
Source:
The Japan Times, January 28, 2005: 'Road
injuries hit record high in 2004' ('The NPA attributed the decline
to fewer cases of drunk driving, following the enforcement of a
tougher drunk driving law, and greater use of seat belts.')
-
Source:
Press Release: 'DOT
Announces Record Low Highway Fatality Rate in 2004', August 1,
2005. [See also the DSA response to this press release: 'US
Highway Safety Targets and Achievements are Far Too Low'
]. In addition, the US 2004 'VMT ['Vehicle Miles Travelled']
rate of deaths, of 1.46, may be converted to the much more commonly
used deaths-per-one-billion-vehicle-kilometers by multiplying the US
figure by 6.215, which gives a 2004 rate of 9.07;
-
'...Minister
Jesmond Mugliett said Malta today has one of the highest levels of
motorization in Europe, with 680 motor vehicles registered for every
1,000 inhabitants. Although the country nevertheless has the lowest
per capita fatality rate in Europe, with 40 road traffic-related
deaths per million, the statistic can be misleading since the fatality
rate per kilometre travelled is still higher than the European
average, given the relatively short trips that one can travel on the
island...' from the article 'Increasing
Road Safety is Tantamount to Saving Lives', published by di-ve,
in Malta, on 7 September, 2005;
-
Article:
'Road
accident toll highest in world: Iran official', from Iran
Mania, London; September 14, 2005;
-
Article:
'8,000
road deaths in Gulf last year', from the Gulf
Times; 19 September, 2005;
-
Article:
'Ten
Percent of World's Road Deaths in India', from the New
Kerala; 28 September, 2005 (though from the figures given by the
Institution of Engineers (India), DSA would suggest that the 'ten
percent' should actually read 7.5 percent');
-
It
has been alleged that the road-death toll in China is vastly higher
than the official number given, hence the reason for it being posted
at the bottom of the DSA list;
-
Article:
'Steps
to Reduce Road Deaths', from the New Straits Times; 15 October,
2005. The article related to the aim of reducing the rate of deaths
per 10,000 registered motor vehicles, from 8.4 in 1996, through the
current 4.5 to a target of 2, by 2010;
-
Science
Daily; January 7, 2006.
|