Fight Back With Facts

A site by Idris Francis
    • Home
    • The Speed Camera Delusion
    • Camera overview
      • Analysis of 6m accidents
      • Regression to Mean
      • Casualty graphs
      • Individual Camera Sites
      • Analysis of official data
    • Discrepancies
      • Speed Does Not Kill – USA 1999
      • Stats19 data do not understate speeding
      • KSI under-reporting
      • Camera errors
    • False Claims of effectiveness
      • Cameras versus Activated Signs
        • DfT skewed data and analysis
      • Cambridgeshire False Claims
      • Hampshire’s cameras cause collisions
      • Humberside False Claims
      • Ireland False Claims
      • London (TfL) False claims
      • Scotland False Claims
      • SERC at the LSE False Claims
      • Thames Valley cameras cause collisions
      • Wales Go Safe False Claims
      • Contributory Factors 2005
    • 20mph Fiasco
      • 20′s Plenty Nonsense
      • Portsmouth’s 20mph “Success”
      • Bristol’s flawed 20mph claims
    • Web Site Misinformation
    • Presentations
      • To IAM Portsmouth
      • To Welsh Government
    • Bogus DfT accident values
    • Organisations
      • Department for Transport
      • Partnerships
      • PACTS
      • BRAKE, the anti-speed organisation
    • Motion Induced Blindness – SMIDSY
    • Intelligent Speed Adaptation
    • Model Flying on Tomorrow’s World
    • A Charismatic Lady’s life in 240 photographs
    • Casualties & economics, Gullon

Camera errors

There is a considerable amount of evidence that speed cameras can give false readings, including for example 8mph for a brick wall, or high readings due to shutters at the back of large vans. This section will cover that evidence, including the ways that such errors can easily be generated deliberately.

Comments are closed.

Developed by South.co.uk