The first attached document is a more detailed version of my submission to the Transport Select Committed dated February 2008, exposing many of the false claims and statements made by the DfT, police, and indeed Transcom itself about road casualty trends and methods and the supposed benefits if speed cameras. The 24 pages contain much detail and logical analysis, supported by many other documents referred to in the text and listed below in the same sequence and with the relevant letter prefix.
Of all the information on this web site this is perhaps the one that gives the best overall view of what happened at least until 2007. When time permits I will add an up-to-date appendix. Note that in a few cases additional documents not referred to directly in the text, have been added for convenience here.
Downloads
- Britain's Road Safety Tragedy
- B.21 1950 to 2006 Casualties
- B.22 1950 to 2006 Casualties on Logarithmic scale
- B.23 1984 to 2006 Casualties Logarithmic scale
- B.24 Buckingham Report exposing false claims
- C.21 Speeds etc 2006
- C.22 Causation 2005
- C.23 Exceeding Limit 1996 to 2006 cars
- C.24 Exceeding Limit 1996 to 2006 All
- Avon & Somerset accounts 2005-06
- D.31 4th year report speed cameras
- 4 Year Evaluation Report - a critique
- D.32 Eight Area Trial
- D.33 Doctors Are The Third Leading Cause of Death
- D.34 Dr Mark Porter on medical mistakes
- D.35 Hospital Deaths
- D.36 Eight Area v Rest K
- D.37 Eight Area v Rest SI
- D.38 Valuation of Accidents (now known to be spurious, see main index for details)
- D.39 Cameras First Year Report - Executive Summary
- E.21 DfT orders camera side effect research
- E.22 DfT cancels camera side effect research
- E.23 Adverse effects by Safe Speed
- E.24 Adverse Effects of Speed Cameras
- E.25 Times and RAC on Speed Cameras
- E.26 Autocar - The £150m failure
- Speed Camera Damage to road safety 03a1c9
- Speed Camera Damage Update
- F.21 TRL548
- F.22 Select Ctttee Report
- F.23 Letter 1 to Ctee
- F.24 Dunwoody Denial
- F.25 DfT reply no 2
- F.26 Appx A pg 21 Oxford Camera
- F.27 Oxfordshire FoI reply
- F.28 Appx A pg 94 Norfolk Signs
- F.29 Norfolk CC FoI reply
- F.30 Letter 2 to the Cttee
- F.31 Dunwoody 2nd rejection
- F.32 Letter 3 to Cttee
- F.33 Letter 3 to Ladyman
- F.34 Ladyman to Cttee
- F.35 Cttee to Ladyman
- F.36 Letter to Ladyman
- F.37 Letter 4 to Cttee
- F.38 Letter 5 to Cttee
- F.39 Letter 6 to Cttee
- F.40 Letter to DfT on their refusal
- F.41 Cost Effectiveness of Cameras and Vas
- F.42 Accountant's Report
- F.43 Unit cost analysis 2005-06
- F.44 Bucks Costs B+W
- F.45 Number of Speed Cameras
- F.46 Partnership accounts summary 2005-06
- G.21 UK 1966 to 2006 K v SI
- G.22 UK 1966 to 2008 K and SI
- G.23 BMJ report
- G.24 Reporting Levels
- G.25 DfT v Hospital SI graphs
- G.26 Casualty NHS v Stats 19
- G.27 Target effects
- G.28 Casualties 2005 Detailed
- G.29 Statistics Comm on undercounting
- H.31 Media report of 53 lives claim
- H.32 Letter to Brunstrom
- H.33 N Wales K Graph
- H.34 West Mercia Report
- H.35 Lancashire SCP Errors
- H.36 Lancashire Casualties Graphs
- H.37 N Wales Complaint
- H.38 Sussex complaint
- H.39 Sussex Casualty Graphs
- H.40 Essex Casualty Graphs
- H.41 Hughes Threatens Defendants
- H.42 Humberside
- J.21 K per head 1995 comparisons
- J.22 K per head 1995 to 2005 % falls
- J.23 K per head 1980 to 2005 Graphs
- J.24 K per head 1995 to 2005 Graphs
- J.25 K per head 2005 comparisons
- J.26 International Comparisons 2004
- J.27 K per head 2006 to 5 and 2005 to 2000
- J.28 K per head comparisons 1980 to 2004
- J.29 International casualty comparison 2005